Unusual
Occupations. The Crossing Sweeper
Before the
advent of the motor car, travel was by horse-drawn vehicle, whether
transporting people or goods. In the mid-nineteenth
century it is estimated that there were over 300,000 horses in London and that
1,000 tons of horse dung was dropped on the streets each day. The streets were filthy with muck and all
sorts of rubbish, caused not only by horses but also by cattle being driven
through the streets to the livestock markets.
Crossing sweepers made a living sweeping road crossings, pavements and
steps, clearing them of the foul mud and debris.
The crossing
Sweepers job was to shovel the muck so that ladies with long dresses and
delicate footwear and gentlemen in their fine raiment might cross without
getting soiled. As the job required very
little outlay it was an obvious choice for the very poor. The job, which was done by children and the
aged and infirm was regarded as the lowest form of working for an income, just
above begging. Children sweepers often
worked in gangs and shared their earnings at the end of the day, gang wars often broke out between groups
trying to take over each others patches.
City
residents had mixed views about crossing sweeping, some regarded it as little
more than make-believe of work as a pretext for begging, others believed it legitimate providing a useful service. A comment in The Art Journal of 1864 noted
that crossing sweepers “are of a different class from the pickpocket and
vagrant classes who prowl about to make what prizes fall within their reach.”
As residents
increasingly complained about the nuisance of begging children, the local powers tried to remove them from the
streets and in 1882 a lady pedestrian wrote “A few years ago there were many
children and men who turned out immediately after a snowfall, brushing the
crossings as clean as they could. For
this service many gladly gave a few coins, regarding the sweepers not as
beggars or vagrants, but as labourers whose hard and disagreeable work enabled
well-shod people to pass on their way.”
In the second
half of the nineteenth century various journalists researched the life of the
crossing sweeper, the principal one being Henry Mayhew (1812-1887). He was editor of the magazine Punch and well
known as a social researcher, publishing many articles which were later
compiled into “London Labour and the London Poor”.
A piece in
the Edinburgh Journal in 1852 listed seven types of sweepers found on London
streets, professional, morning, occasional,
Sunday, deformed maimed and crippled sweeper and female, who plied their trade
with varying degrees of skill, effort and financial success.
Henry Mayhew
referred to casual and regular sweepers, the casuals only working some days of
the week and at various different places whilst the regulars swept one
particular crossing every day. Residents
had differing attitudes to crossing sweepers, some considering them little
better than beggars whilst others viewed them as legitimate workers providing a
useful service which was missed when absent.
The
occupation of Crossing Sweeper is recorded in Charles Dickens novel Bleak House
where “Jo fights it at his crossing among
the mud and wheels, the horses, whips and umbrellas and gets but a scanty sum.” Jo was
one of the most significant figures in the novel and was a way for Dickens to
address juvenile vagrancy which was a serious problem at the time.
The introduction
of the omnibus onto London’s streets during
the late nineteenth century meant that
Londoners were able jump onto a bus and avoid walking on the dirty street and
in 1902 the first motorised bus was introduced.
The motorisation of buses, followed by commercial vehicles, rapidly
lowered the number of horses on the streets and the occupation of crossing
sweeper became obsolete.
Mechanisation taking all the jobs again!
ReplyDeleteMight need a new version - pot hole filler? Happily give to that role.
ReplyDeleteI wonder what the ladies and gents would have thought if there wasn't anyone shovelling the ****. In India the lowest caste Dalits (untouchables) did similar jobs.
ReplyDelete