Propagation - Nazis etc
Propagation is the
‘action of widely spreading and promoting an idea, theory, etc” and therefore a
description of the spread of Nazi-ism throughout Germany and into Europe. The initiation of the process of propagation is
an idea – in this case, Hitler’s idea, expanded to the 25 points of the Nazi
Party to be the foundation of the principle of German nationalism and land
ownership with race purity (German blood) could be a countryman.
The growth of
the Nazi party and the adoption of the party’s ideals was promulgated through propaganda,
the material and ideals shared through propagation. The Nazis wanted Germans to support the Nazi
dictatorship and believe in Nazi ideas.
To accomplish this, they tried to control forms of communication, using
propaganda principles to spread the messages they wished to promote.
The act of propagation
requires the means to disseminate the propaganda - to facilitate this the Nazis
took control of newspapers, magazines, books, art, theatre, films and
radio. They provided new textbooks to
schools, with the messages – obey the Nazis, love Hitler, hate Jews. At the same time, textbooks which did not support
this messaging were removed from schools. In 1933
the Nazis started to propagate their messages – including glorification of
Hitler. As well as controlling the
narrative, the Nazis also provided access to Hitler’s messages through provision
of cheaper radios and using loudspeakers.
By this control
of media channel, they were able to control the narrative. At the same time they also actively censored
communications that did not promote the Nazi idea and ideals. The outcomes of the successful use of propaganda
by the Nazi party is well documented, and not the purpose of this piece.
The use of propaganda
may also be associated with other outcomes that may create divisive views –
communism, the Vietnam war, religious persecution, suffragettes, climate
change, racism, national fervour, trans-inclusive cisgender radical feminist views.
Propaganda – to
me, has negative connotations – and somehow feels like it’s a bad thing, it’s a
way of influencing things in a bad way, it’s messaging that leads to bad things
(a subjective view) – the term seems only to be used when today’s media would like
us to feel that something bad is influencing us. So, are we the subject of propaganda by today’s
media? What are the messages that are
being propagated today to us? Do we
recognise that we are being influenced by propaganda? Are the media channels influenced or
controlled in a way to provide only information that it’s felt we should hear? Who makes that decision? In the case of the Nazis it was Hitler.
Propagation of
ideas is an abstract notion which can manifest by the sharing and dissemination
of propaganda. Conversely the propagation
of plant life is physical, practical and positive, although it’s intent is to
preserve the characteristics of a particular plant (and so was the notion of
the Aryan race) – with good intention, beneficial effect, life affirming and life
sustaining, it happens naturally, organically, in the wind… and can be
supported by intervention which makes it even more effective.
But that’s not
the point of this tale…
So very interesting! Did not know propaganda/propagation. Now I do!
ReplyDelete